Blog
Home
buyout
DOTC and MRTC
Government
MRT3
MRTC’s Bob Sobrepena
Philippines
Will The DOTC Give Way In Initiating The Talks With MRTC? #PublishingArticles
Will The DOTC Give Way In Initiating The Talks With MRTC? #PublishingArticles
As I observed the drama between DOTC and MRTC, what bother most to the MRT3 train commuters and maybe, all Filipinos; was the way the government treated this kind of problem. From the onset of this MRT3 Project up to now, the government through the Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) doesn’t have a clear solution in giving excellent service to the riding public. Why was that?
Until now, the two dragons never have the time to talk it over, but the train commuters are suffering without any hope in the future. Who will initiate then, our leaders who knew the reasons why or will wait for a year for its development?
DOTC Secretary Jun Abaya bolstered that more on the pipeline of the government action plans for MRT3 could be materialized next year of September 2015. Train riders would expect positive changes because DOTC will pursue its P53.9-billion takeover of the MRT3 parallel to its implementation and of much-needed improvement projects for the train system. The modernization and upgrading of MRT Line 3 is critical in order to improve our services to passengers in terms of both safety and convenience. Most of these projects will be completed in 2015 and 2016 under current timelines, which is why we are already pursuing them separately from the buyout.
And why the government wanted a buyout of the MRT3, but nothing seems to be undertaken to the owner of the MRTC, which is under the private entities of MRT Holdings? The private companies are willing to sit down and discuss about this ordeal without spending any amount whatsoever?
MRTC’s Bob Sobrepena’s opening up unification with DOTC through the media because the government did not take them to any meetings and negotiations so far. Even in negotiation of purchasing of train coaches. But in fact, they have the right over MRT3 operations. “Nobody has actually talked to us, written to us, communicated, any offer to buy. The only thing we know about is it what we read in the papers of the intentions. He said MRT Holdings is open to discussing buyout talks with the government but, at the same time, stressed that he believes the MRT3 will be better off if it is operated by the private sector.
While Secretary Jun Abaya said, “The government has yet to implement the buyout in full blast, as agencies involved in the takeover have yet to finalize the details of the deal. We need to work together in the interest of MRT 3 riders. The government is still finalizing the details of its buyout plan, but we will bring this to the private owner as soon as it is completed. The buyout will pave the way for our long-term plans, which is intended to deliver not only a decent MRT3 system to the public, but one that we can look forward to taking.”
Why buying it out and then returning to the private owner when it’s complete? Why not directly give to MRT Holdings for its complete acquisition into privatization? The government doesn’t have to pay anything and that’s a big savings.
Now that Bob Sobrepena’s and MRT Holdings are reaching out for the government, will the DOTC give way in initiating the talks?
Leaders of our beloved country - why not accept Bob Sobrepena’s privatization offer and sit down for this never ending novel of MRT3?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
The Nitty-Gritty of MRT3 Rehabilitation and Development #PublishingArticles During the resumption of a public hearing on the problems ...
-
How To Maximize Your Experiences With Arts And Crafts #PublishingArticles People have been making crafts as far back as we know from r...
-
4 Advantages of Publishing Articles on the Internet #PublishingArticles One of the most effective ways to generate traffic is publishing...
-
Victorian and Edwardian Mahogany Bathroom Wood Paneling #PublishingArticles Victorian and Edwardian bathrooms have never really gone out ...
-
The Different Ways To Publish A Book - Explained In Simple Words #PublishingArticles Officially, to publish a book, there are three way...
Read Me First
The selected online articles, images, and videos are to provide you with quality content for visitors, allowing to browse and read. Post in a comment box your intent and link. Be honest and patient for all the posted articles by way of thanking the respective authors for their quality articles.
Comment Guidelines: 1) Do not post material that is unlawful, defamatory, invasive of another’s privacy or obscene to a reasonable person. 2) Stay on topic. Only comment on the subject. 3) Any spam will be removed. 4) Any profane, provocative, offensive or derogatory content will be removed.
The author of this blog reserve the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice. This comment policy is subject to change anytime.
Disclaimer: You agree not to hold the author of this blog liable for any errors in publishing articles, content differences and any damage whatsoever on your part; be it emotional, physical, psychological, illness, diseases, death, side effects and other medical subjects that you administered. Also, you accept that you'll not file any charges against the author in any territory around the world. Contact the author for any theft of original content you did not authorize to be published and we will remove it immediately. The author does and will not endorse material published in articles or submitted sites to be accurate information and should not be used for medical or legal references. The author of this blog, respective authors and publishers of articles and websites is to be used as a guide only and should not be seen as true and correct without further research and consulting medical and health professionals.
Comment Guidelines: 1) Do not post material that is unlawful, defamatory, invasive of another’s privacy or obscene to a reasonable person. 2) Stay on topic. Only comment on the subject. 3) Any spam will be removed. 4) Any profane, provocative, offensive or derogatory content will be removed.
The author of this blog reserve the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice. This comment policy is subject to change anytime.
Disclaimer: You agree not to hold the author of this blog liable for any errors in publishing articles, content differences and any damage whatsoever on your part; be it emotional, physical, psychological, illness, diseases, death, side effects and other medical subjects that you administered. Also, you accept that you'll not file any charges against the author in any territory around the world. Contact the author for any theft of original content you did not authorize to be published and we will remove it immediately. The author does and will not endorse material published in articles or submitted sites to be accurate information and should not be used for medical or legal references. The author of this blog, respective authors and publishers of articles and websites is to be used as a guide only and should not be seen as true and correct without further research and consulting medical and health professionals.
Yeah, why not accept the privatization offer? It'll be a better choice.
ReplyDeleteThe issues in MRT system should be addressed seriously. It's a pain to ride the MRT and I experienced the worst things. I hope they will give immediate action to this.
ReplyDeleteBoth parties should just talk. It's being tiresome reading news on how MRT have deteriorated when we should ba having more lines by now.
ReplyDeletePrivatization is good for MRT to serve the public. But in terms of fare they should regulate that too. Kasi baka pag naging pribado tataas naman ang pamasahe. Malaking abala naman at pasanin kay Juan Dela Cruz ito.
ReplyDeleteExactly my thoughts. Once privatized, there wouldn't be any control on how they will pass all expenses to the commuters. It's still business
DeleteMost a times this government or should i say rich people are this way.
ReplyDeleteMRT now is a big problem specially to those employees who need to ride the train to be able to get to their office. I think I agree with Cheryl privatization is a great idea but they should consider the people who will be using it in terms of the fare.
ReplyDeleteIssues with the MRT can be seen as quite a problem to those that do need to use the transportation. They should really be more considerate :(
ReplyDeleteI really hope they stop thinking of their private interests and start thinking about the welfare of the commuters.
ReplyDelete